<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Fans of Tech &#187; outlook</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fansoftech.com/tag/outlook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fansoftech.com</link>
	<description>Web. Gadgets. Tech.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 01:52:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Outlook 2010: Regrettably Underwhelming</title>
		<link>http://www.fansoftech.com/2009/07/16/outlook-2010-regrettably-underwhelming/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fansoftech.com/2009/07/16/outlook-2010-regrettably-underwhelming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google-wave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[messaging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[simplyfile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taglocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techhit]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fansoftech.com/?p=633</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can be a Microsoft fanboy from time to time, I’ll admit that. I’ll also admit that I’ve been looking forward to Outlook 2010 since Outlook 2007 first arrived… mainly because when OL2K7 was released to manufacturers in late 2006, it was STILL missing alot of productivity features; some of which Gmail debuted with almost [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can be a Microsoft fanboy from time to time, I’ll admit that. I’ll also admit that I’ve been looking forward to Outlook 2010 since Outlook 2007 first arrived… mainly because when OL2K7 was released to manufacturers in late 2006, it was STILL missing alot of productivity features; some of which Gmail debuted with almost 3 years prior. I’m talking about conversation view, the ability to quickly move a message to a specific folder, <em>effective </em>keyboard shortcuts, etc.<span id="more-633"></span></p>
<p>Now, I think OL2K7 was a significant improvement over 2K3 but that’s not really saying much. I am, however, stunned to see (with the Office 2010 technical preview released this week) that Outlook 2010 has not made the leaps and bounds it truly needs to make in order to remain both relevant and competitive.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">What has improved</span>?</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.fansoftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/20090716_Outlook2010Interface.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; margin: 0px 7px 7px 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="Outlook 2010 Technical Preview Main Interface" src="http://www.fansoftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/20090716_Outlook2010Interface_thumb.png" border="0" alt="Outlook 2010 Technical Preview Main Interface" width="244" height="148" align="left" /></a>Well, <strong>the Outlook interface</strong> is finally in sync with the rest of the Office platform. Meaning, of course, that the infamous “Ribbon” is now all throughout the application instead of just within new message windows as it was in 2K7. (I read <a title="BetaNews.com: &quot;A wishlist for Office 2010.&quot;" href="http://www.betanews.com/article/A-wish-list-for-Office-2010/1245950197">an article on BetaNews.com by one Carmi Levy</a> stating that they wish Microsoft would do away with the Ribbon altogether. I wholeheartedly disagree and think that the Ribbon is a great way – especially for touch displays now and in the future – to quickly find what you’re looking for.) In addition, the overall appearance is very bright and refreshing. There are still some theme options in place but the default is great in my humble opinion.</p>
<p><strong>Conversation view</strong> has, at long last, been added to Outlook. It’s still a tiny bit quirky but it acts pretty much the way you’d expect it to. If a message comes in that’s a reply to an existing message, any related messages to that particular subject line are displayed with it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fansoftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/20090716_Outlook2010Launch.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 7px 7px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="Outlook 2010 Technical Preview Splash Screen" src="http://www.fansoftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/20090716_Outlook2010Launch_thumb.png" border="0" alt="Outlook 2010 Technical Preview Splash Screen" width="244" height="165" align="right" /></a>The <strong>startup process</strong>, while unfortunately lengthy (see next section), is a bit less annoying. The improvement comes with the <strong>new animated launch screen</strong> – it stays up until Outlook is fully ready to be used. Previous versions of Outlook were a bit of a tease in that the window would launch but you’d be waiting about 5 seconds for each element of the application to appear: 5 seconds for add-in toolbar A, another 5 seconds for add-in toolbar B, 5 seconds for the To-Do bar to appear, etc. I find I have more patience with the animated splash screen… and patience is a rare commodity these days.</p>
<p><strong>Message clean-up</strong> is ever-so-slightly enhanced. You’ll notice in the first screenshot above that Microsoft has finally embraced the concept of “tagging” in Outlook but only barely. In the screenshot above, there’s an area of the first Ribbon section called “Tags.” However, all that area presents is a drop-down allowing you to use the previously-existing “Categories” functionality of Outlook to file a message to categories of your choice. This is exactly what the <a title="Fans of Tech: &quot;Taglocity Announces v2.0; Brings Productivity Enhancements and Social Networking to Outlook&quot;" href="http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/05/17/taglocity-v2-brings-productivity-enhancements-and-social-networking-to-outlook/">previously-reviewed Outlook add-in Taglocity</a> does but Taglocity still does it alot better. The aforementioned add-in allows you to jump to a tagging toolbar, begin typing tag/category names (it finds as you type), hit enter and your message is tagged. Hit the escape key and you’re back to your message. The process with the now-slightly-more-visible button is still very much mouse-driven and just doesn’t make sense with frequent Outlook power users.</p>
<p>In addition, there’s a new “Clean-Up” drop-down button in that same section of the Ribbon that allows you to quickly get rid of insignificant, older messages in either the conversation that’s highlighted or all of the conversations currently in your inbox… or even all of your subfolders.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.fansoftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/20090716_Outlook2010QuickSteps.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; margin: 0px 7px 7px 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="2009-07-16_Outlook-2010-Quick-Steps" src="http://www.fansoftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/20090716_Outlook2010QuickSteps_thumb.png" border="0" alt="2009-07-16_Outlook-2010-Quick-Steps" width="219" height="244" align="left" /></a>Quick Steps </strong>represent a fantastic new feature in Outlook 2010. As you might guess from the name, Quick Steps allow you to create shortcuts for various actions like forwarding to a specific person or department or automatically reply to a selected message and delete the original – all in one action. You can even assign a keyboard shortcut to your quick step. A number of Quick Steps are included by default but it’s insanely-easy to create your own.</p>
<p><strong>Forwarding a message as an attachment</strong> now has a designated button in the primary tab of the ribbon. Hit the button and, as you’d expect, a new email comes up with the selected message already as an attachment. This also works with multiple messages… very cool.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">What hasn’t improved</span>?</strong></p>
<p><strong>Filing and organizing messages</strong>. To my knowledge, there’s still no easy and fast, find-as-you-type way to move a message to a specific folder without a 3rd-party Outlook add-in like SimplyFile. <a title="Fans of Tech: &quot;Save Some Valuable Time Every Week Using SimplyFile for Outlook&quot;" href="http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/11/26/save-some-valuable-time-every-week-using-simplyfile-for-outlook/">We reviewed TechHit’s SimplyFile</a> (from the makers of <a title="Fans of Tech: &quot;Invites: QuickJump Beta Drastically Enhances the Process of Finding Folders&quot;" href="http://www.fansoftech.com/2009/05/20/quickjump-beta-enhances-process-of-finding-folders/">QuickJump</a> and <a title="Fans of Tech: &quot;Tweet Till Your Heart's Content from Within Outlook&quot;" href="http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/09/24/update-your-facebook-status-and-tweet-till-your-hearts-content-from-within-outlook/">TWinbox</a>) way back when and it offers a very Gmail-esque way of moving messages using the keyboard while remaining in your inbox. It’s a beautiful process and while I’d hate for TechHit to lose a revenue stream (still plenty of other great features in SimplyFile), this is functionality that should already be in Outlook… especially when this sucker is released in the year two-thousand and ten. C’mon, Microsoft. Seriously. Gmail also has this with the new <a title="Gmail Blog: &quot;New Ways to Label with Move To and Auto-Complete&quot;" href="http://gmailblog.blogspot.com/2009/02/new-ways-to-label-with-move-to-and-auto.html">“Move To” (keyboard shortcut “V”) and “Label” (keyboard shortcut “L”)</a> features.</p>
<p>It’s most likely due to the fact that <a title="Microsoft Outlook Team Blog: &quot;Announcing Microsoft Office 2010 Technical Preview&quot;" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/outlook/archive/2009/07/14/announcing-microsoft-office-2010-technical-preview.aspx">it’s a technical preview</a> but <strong>Outlook’s performance</strong> over that of Outlook 2K7 w/SP2 has TANKED. The migration process was a lengthy 10-20 minute process… and I’m on a dual-core with 4gb of RAM so resources aren’t scarce by any means. Any subsequent, routine launches also take more time than 2007 required.</p>
<p>The <strong>reply process </strong>still inserts your own email address when clicking reply on an email you sent. Technically, that makes sense since <strong>you’re </strong>replying to an email that <strong>you </strong>sent. Intuitively, it makes absolutely no sense at all. In 99.9% of all cases, I’m just going to want to follow-up with someone on an email I already sent them – I’m not following up with myself. Gmail does this correctly. There, you hit reply on an email you sent and the email address of the original intended recipient is automatically inserted in the “to” field.</p>
<p>In addition to bare-minimal support of “tagging,” <strong>Outlook has <em>still</em> yet to present us with an option to add notes to an email</strong>. Sure, with the 2010 Office suite, OneNote will be included and it’s pretty easy to send a message to OneNote from within Outlook. However, that involves and entirely separate program and is entirely unintuitive… as well as a waste of time. C’mon, Microsoft… you already have a “notes” section inside Outlook… just find a way to marry messaging and notes and give us the option to add a freakin’ note to a message without having to modify the message itself.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">What’s regressed</span>?</strong></p>
<p><strong>3rd-party add-ins have taken a significant hit</strong> in Outlook 2010 as a result of the ribbon. The one solitary problem with the Ribbon is that it takes the place of loads and loads of various toolbars that previous versions of Microsoft Office required. Instead, each toolbar is replaced with a “tab” on the ribbon. The problem here is that many Outlook add-ins require visibility in order to maintain full functionality and to be as effective as possible. For instance, with <a title="TechHit: SimplyFile" href="http://www.techhit.com/SimplyFile/">the SimplyFile add-in</a> within Outlook 2007, there remained a toolbar at the bottom of the window with a drop-down of folders and a SimplyFile button (among other items.) With a highlighted message, I could hit that button and my message would automatically be filed to the correct location. Now, there’s an extra click in the process as I have to navigate to the add-ins tab on the ribbon to get the button… which really disrupts the natural flow of that process.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Overall</span></strong></p>
<p>Sure, the list of items under the “What has improved” section of this post is longer (mostly minor items) than the other sections but I’ve been genuinely let down by this version &#8211; as it stands now in a Technical Preview. I have absolutely no idea how Outlook will remain relevant over the next few years as Gmail &amp; Google Apps both continue to grow exponentially while we wait for Office 15. Plus, Google has <a title="Google Wave" href="http://wave.google.com/help/wave/about.html">Google Wave coming down the pipeline</a> which, according to pretty much everyone (I seriously have yet to read a non-Microsoft, negative opinion on Google Wave), will be the end-all, be-all of productivity apps. Good luck, Microsoft. You’re gonna need it.</p>
<p>What about you, readers? Have you had a chance to play around with Outlook 2010? What are your thoughts? Let us know in the comments.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fansoftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/20090716_Outlook2010IncomingAppt.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="2009-07-16_Outlook-2010-Incoming-Appt" src="http://www.fansoftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/20090716_Outlook2010IncomingAppt_thumb.png" border="0" alt="2009-07-16_Outlook-2010-Incoming-Appt" width="414" height="215" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.fansoftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/20090716_Outlook2010Contacts.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="2009-07-16_Outlook-2010-Contacts" src="http://www.fansoftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/20090716_Outlook2010Contacts_thumb.png" border="0" alt="2009-07-16_Outlook-2010-Contacts" width="414" height="302" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fansoftech.com/2009/07/16/outlook-2010-regrettably-underwhelming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taglocity Debuts New Beta; Borrows a Page from Xobni</title>
		<link>http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/10/02/taglocity-debuts-new-beta-borrows-a-page-from-xobni/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/10/02/taglocity-debuts-new-beta-borrows-a-page-from-xobni/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[communication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web20]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/10/02/taglocity-debuts-new-beta-borrows-a-page-from-xobni/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taglocity, the company behind the Outlook organizational add-in of the same name (which we’ve covered before) just debuted a new beta of Taglocity for Outlook.&#160; This time, they’ve drawn a little bit of inspiration from Xobni.
Taglocity, for those of you that don’t know, is a simple add-in designed to allow for “tagging” of emails, tasks, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.taglocity.com">Taglocity</a>, the company behind the Outlook organizational add-in of the same name (<a title="Fans of Tech: &quot;Taglocity Brings Productivity Enhancements and Social Networking to Outlook&quot;" href="http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/05/17/taglocity-v2-brings-productivity-enhancements-and-social-networking-to-outlook/">which we’ve covered before</a>) just debuted a new beta of Taglocity for Outlook.&#160; This time, they’ve drawn a little bit of inspiration from <a href="http://www.xobni.com">Xobni</a>.</p>
<p>Taglocity, for those of you that don’t know, is a simple add-in designed to allow for “tagging” of emails, tasks, appointments, etc. in an effort to make organization of those items in Microsoft’s infamous email client a little easier.&#160; </p>
<p>I’m personally a big fan so I was a bit troubled when I received a message this morning stating that my beta software had expired.&#160; After downloading the most up-to-date version from taglocity.com, I was presented with a few big changes.&#160; The two biggest changes in the new release are the “Taglocity Task Pane” and “Conversation View.”&#160; </p>
<p>The first big change, the task pane, is where the Xobni reference comes into play.&#160; The task pane, much like in Xobni, is displayed to the right of the message you’re reading and is an area where you can view snapshot information in regards to the individual who sent you the message.&#160; (e.g., recently exchanged messages, files exchanged with the sender, number of emails to/from, etc.)&#160; Those of you who currently use Xobni know exactly what I’m talking about.&#160; In fact, here’s a visual comparison of the two:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fansoftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/image1.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; margin: 0px 0px 10px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" src="http://www.fansoftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/image-thumb.png" width="270" height="359" /></a>    <br />(Click on the image for a larger view.)</p>
<p>To clarify,&#160; I’m not saying that Taglocity has blatantly ripped Xobni off or anything because I think the new task pane fits perfectly into the features that they’ve been building up over the last few versions: groups/networking.</p>
<p>The other new feature, conversation view, is exactly what you might expect.&#160; Clicking the conversation view button on the Taglocity toolbar brings up a quick window that neatly displays all of the messages related to the same subject.&#160; It seems to work perfectly and is a great replacement to Outlook’s “Find Related Messages” which inevitably takes a while to pull up.&#160; (Xobni also has this feature but it’s a little too slow for me.)</p>
<p>If you’ve yet to give Taglocity a try, you can sign up for the beta at Taglocity.com but I’d personally recommend reading about <a title="Taglocity: Discover Enterprise Email Management: Boost Email Productivity | Leverage Knowledge Assets" href="http://www.taglocity.com/discovermore.html">what all the software has to offer</a> prior to doing so.&#160; It’s designed to do more than just “tag” messages – although, admittedly, that’s primarily what I use it for – so far.&#160; Also, a recent post on Taglocity’s blog also gives some great insight on what the company desires to achieve with its flagship product: “<a title="Taglocity Official Blog: &quot;Saving Email - A Brief History&quot;" href="http://blog.taglocity.com/blog/bid/5620/Saving-Email-A-Brief-History">Saving Email – A Brief History</a>.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/10/02/taglocity-debuts-new-beta-borrows-a-page-from-xobni/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Office Outlook Connector for Hotmail: Better than IMAP</title>
		<link>http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/09/30/microsoft-office-outlook-connector-for-hotmail-better-than-imap/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/09/30/microsoft-office-outlook-connector-for-hotmail-better-than-imap/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 01:34:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hotmail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows live]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/09/30/microsoft-office-outlook-connector-for-hotmail-better-than-imap/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, Google’s been offering IMAP access to Gmail for quite some time now.&#160; What about Windows Live Hotmail users…all eight of them?&#160; Are they just left hangin’ with *scoff* POP3?&#160; (Okay, I kid…there are literally hundreds* of Hotmail users still in existence.)
Well, if you’re a Hotmail user that also has access to Microsoft Outlook, either [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Google’s been offering IMAP access to Gmail for quite some time now.&#160; What about Windows Live Hotmail users…all eight of them?&#160; Are they just left hangin’ with *scoff* POP3?&#160; (Okay, I kid…there are literally hundreds* of Hotmail users still in existence.)</p>
<p>Well, if you’re a Hotmail user that also has access to Microsoft Outlook, either at home or at work, then you’re in luck.&#160; For a little while now, Microsoft has been offering <a title="Microsoft Office Online: &quot;Microsoft Office Outlook Connector&quot;" href="http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook/HA102225181033.aspx">Microsoft Office Outlook Connector</a>: an Outlook plugin that lets you access and synchronize your Hotmail account(s) from within Outlook.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fansoftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/image22.png"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px" title="image" border="0" alt="image" align="left" src="http://www.fansoftech.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/image-thumb18.png" width="168" height="135" /></a> Much like with IMAP, E-mails that you send/receive/file in Outlook are mirrored in your Hotmail account online upon hitting that magical Send/Receive button.&#160; </p>
<p>For example, e-mails that you send from your account in Outlook are, as you might expect, stored in the “sent items” folder right there in Outlook but also get uploaded to the “sent items” folder of Hotmail.&#160; (Same for “deleted items,” “drafts,” etc.)&#160; In addition, the tool also allows you to synchronize your Hotmail contacts and calendar.</p>
<p>In my opinion, this option acts even better than traditional IMAP access because, for the most part, IMAP remains a relatively flaky technology.&#160; As an Outlook/Gmail user, I experience the following annoyances with my Gmail IMAP connection in Outlook 2007:&#160; frequent disconnects, quirky synchronizations, LENGTHY synchronization times and my own personal favorite… the inability to take advantage of Outlook’s feature-rich flagging options on messages. </p>
<p>That last one is actually a problem with how Outlook treats IMAP connections, not a problem with IMAP in general…but allow me to explain.&#160; You see, natively, you can right-click on a message in Outlook and “flag” it for follow-up by selecting one of many different follow-up options: Today, Tomorrow, This Week, Next Week, No Date and Custom.&#160; That flagged message then appears as a “task” in your task list or in your To-Do Bar (new to OL2007.)&#160; With IMAP messages, you only get one follow-up option: “Flag.”&#160; Then, if you do decide to go ahead and generically flag that bad boy, it shows up multiple times in your To-Do Bar.&#160; (That one’s actually due to the Gmail IMAP folder structure in Outlook.)&#160; </p>
<p>Neither of these quirks exist with messages retrieved by the Outlook Connector.&#160; Sure, that’s not a big deal but I personally find it highly annoying.</p>
<p>Anyways, I’ll most likely not be switching back to Windows Live Hotmail anytime soon (mainly due to that horrificly awful banner ad in place at mail.live.com) but I wanted to point out the availability and uniqueness of this particular tool to those of you using the Hotmail/Outlook (2003 or 2007) combo.&#160; If you’re interested, you can find it for download <a title="Download: Microsoft Office Outlook Connector 12.1 Beta 2" href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=9A2279B1-DF0A-46E1-AA93-7D4870871ECF&amp;displaylang=en">here on Microsoft’s downloads site</a> or packaged as an available option in the new <a title="Downloads - Windows Live" href="http://download.live.com/">Windows Live Wave 3</a> installer.</p>
<p>*Hundreds, few million…same diff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/09/30/microsoft-office-outlook-connector-for-hotmail-better-than-imap/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft&#8217;s Personal Folders Backup Utility for Outlook Has Been Updated; Now Compatible with 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/06/14/personal-folders-backup-utility-for-outlook-now-compatible-with-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/06/14/personal-folders-backup-utility-for-outlook-now-compatible-with-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 18:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fansoftech.com/?p=228</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re a frequent user of Microsoft Outlook 2002 or 2003, you may have already stumbled upon and gotten used to having the Personal Folders Backup utility.&#160; The 2mb download installs as an add-in to Outlook and allows you to backup your Personal Folders File (.PST) with just a click or two.&#160; It&#8217;s quite convenient [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re a frequent user of Microsoft Outlook 2002 or 2003, you may have already stumbled upon and gotten used to having the Personal Folders Backup utility.&#160; The 2mb download installs as an add-in to Outlook and allows you to backup your Personal Folders File (.PST) with just a click or two.&#160; It&#8217;s quite convenient and the team behind it has finally updated it to be compatible with Outlook 2007.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.fansoftech.com/images/posts/2008-06-14_Outlook-Backup.png" /><img src="http://www.fansoftech.com/images/posts/2008-06-14_Outlook-Backup-Options.png" />&#160; </p>
<p><a title="Download the Personal Folders Backup Add-In for Microsoft Outlook 2002/2003/2007" href="http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=8b081f3a-b7d0-4b16-b8af-5a6322f4fd01&amp;DisplayLang=en">Download the Personal Folders Backup Add-In here</a> or <a title="Microsoft Office Help: " using the microsoft outlook personal folders backup tool"" href="http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/outlook/HA010875321033.aspx">read more about it on the Microsoft Office Outlook help site</a>.</p>
<p>As an alternative, you can also use the (much more powerful) <a title="Amic Email Backup" href="http://www.amictools.com/v-amic_email_backup.html">Amic Email Backup</a> from <a title="Amic Software Tools" href="http://www.amictools.com/">Amic Tools</a>. This freeware application not only allows you to backup the E-mail &amp; calendar(s) stored in your PST but also backs up your mail and newsgroup account settings in addition to message rules, blocked senders and signatures. (Basically, everything in Outlook that you&#8217;d <em>want </em>to back up.)&#160; In addition, you can schedule automated backups because, let&#8217;s face it, manual just doesn&#8217;t cut it.</p>
<p><strong>Source</strong>: &#8212; <a title="MSDN Blogs: " outlook 2007/2003/2002 Add-In: Personal Folders Backup"" href="http://blogs.technet.com/robse/archive/2008/06/14/outlook-2007-2003-2002-add-in-personal-folders-backup.aspx">Rob Sealock</a> via MSDN Blogs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/06/14/personal-folders-backup-utility-for-outlook-now-compatible-with-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Taglocity Announces v2.0; Brings Productivity Enhancements and Social Networking to Outlook</title>
		<link>http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/05/17/taglocity-v2-brings-productivity-enhancements-and-social-networking-to-outlook/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/05/17/taglocity-v2-brings-productivity-enhancements-and-social-networking-to-outlook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 20:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Enterprise]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taglocity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web20]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fansoftech.com/?p=220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Taglocity, currently in beta, just launched v2.0 of its Outlook 2003/2007 E-mail tagging software.&#160; With this new version, Canada-based Terazen Technology, Inc., added plenty of enhanced features in addition to some social networking features.&#160; (Hey,&#160; why not?&#160; Everybody else is doing it.)
If you&#8217;re unfamiliar with Taglocity, the software essentially allows you to add &#34;tags&#34; to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taglocity, currently in beta, just launched v2.0 of its Outlook 2003/2007 E-mail tagging software.&#160; With this new version, Canada-based Terazen Technology, Inc., added plenty of enhanced features in addition to some social networking features.&#160; (Hey,&#160; why not?&#160; Everybody else is doing it.)</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re unfamiliar with Taglocity, the software essentially allows you to add &quot;tags&quot; to your E-mails, tasks and calendar items from within Microsoft&#8217;s antiquated Outlook product.&#160; To do this, the software takes advantage of Outlook&#8217;s &quot;categories&quot; feature and, for each new &quot;tag&quot; you create with Taglocity, a &quot;category&quot; of the same name will be created behind-the-scenes and added to your Outlook personal files folder (.PST)&#160; </p>
<p>I&#8217;m guessing the object of enhancing already existing Outlook functionality is to provide you with the option of retaining the methods of organization you&#8217;ve established with Taglocity if you no longer wish to use the product anymore.&#160; It makes sense to me&#8230;data portability <em>always</em> makes sense to me.</p>
<p>(What never did make sense to me was why Microsoft never made &quot;categories&quot; a more prevalent feature in Outlook to begin with.&#160; It really is a great way to add organization to Outlook.&#160; Regardless, Taglocity helps to enhance and bring focus to this semi-powerful existing feature.)</p>
<p>Whether you&#8217;re browsing your inbox or composing a new E-mail/task/appointment, you&#8217;re presented with intuitive options via the Taglocity toolbar for adding tags to help you easily find E-mails at a later date:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fansoftech.com/images/posts/2008-05-17_TaglocityBar.png"><img height="14" src="http://www.fansoftech.com/images/posts/2008-05-17_TaglocityBar.png" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>The average <em>Fans of Tech</em> reader already realizes the benefit of tags over folders but there might be a few of you out there still asking&#160; yourself: &quot;why tags?&quot;&#160; Here&#8217;s the answer: after you&#8217;re finished reading an E-mail, one would normally file that message in a single folder in a vein attempt to keep your inbox &quot;organized.&quot;&#160; The problem is that, after a while, you&#8217;ll most likely have multiple folders that pretty much serve a similar purpose.&#160; That leaves you with multiple places to search in order to find the item for which you&#8217;re looking.&#160; With tags (or &quot;labels&quot; if you&#8217;re a Gmail user), you can assign multiple keywords to the item in question thus improving the likelihood that you&#8217;ll find this item whenever you go looking for it.&#160; And, since Taglocity is essentially a plug-in for Outlook, you can do BOTH!&#160; File and tag!</p>
<p>The free product even takes tagging a step further by incorporating two very useful features: Bundles and AutoSuggest.&#160; The latter, as you might guess, makes the tagging process even faster by &quot;suggesting&quot; similar tag matches as you type&#8230;start typing a few characters and if the tag suggestion is the tag you want to apply, just hit &quot;enter.&quot;&#160; The other feature, Bundles, allows you to assign many tags at once by assigning a bundle tag name.&#160; You might equate this feature to &quot;Distribution Groups&quot; in Outlook where you can send an E-mail to ONE distribution group in Outlook and that message is automatically sent to the many different members you&#8217;ve assigned to that DG.&#160; </p>
<p><strong><u>Taglocity &amp; the Entperise</u></strong></p>
<p>From what I can tell, Terazen will monetize Taglocity by selling <a title="Buy Taglocity" href="http://www.taglocity.com/buy.html">enterprise versions of the product</a> which makes perfect sense to me as it would fit very well into the enterprise atmosphere.&#160; One reason I say that has to do with yet another brilliant feature of the product: &quot;groups.&quot;&#160; Here&#8217;s what the site has to say about groups:</p>
<blockquote><p>&quot;Groups are a way of sharing tags and email messages. You can publish common information to our Taglocity groups (with Tags on the message, of course!) which then means other people in the group will be able to search and see. Think of how many CC: email chains you can get rid of!&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I have first-hand experience with the aforementioned E-mail chain problem and I can genuinely see a need for this product in an enterprise setting&#8230;especially for non-profits. (*Shudder* So much E-mail.&#160; *Shudder*)</p>
<p><strong><u>Searching</u></strong></p>
<p>Now, let&#8217;s say you&#8217;ve had Taglocity installed for a few months and you want to go find one of the E-mails you&#8217;ve tagged.&#160; Use the toolbar (see above) and enter your search query on the far-right.&#160; You&#8217;ll be taken to the Taglocity search window (and quickly, I might add.)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fansoftech.com/images/posts/2008-05-17_TaglocitySearch.png"><img height="352" src="http://www.fansoftech.com/images/posts/2008-05-17_TaglocitySearch.png" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>You&#8217;re presented with your results and a quick way to modify those results using the tag cloud at the bottom and side of the window. I don&#8217;t necessarily anticipate using this feature more than the built-in search of Outlook 2007 (as I can typically remember the exact contents of the item I&#8217;m looking for) but, for generic searches, this could still prove to be pretty handy.</p>
<p>Of course, all these settings (tags, searching, etc.) can be tweaked using the utility&#8217;s configuration window:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fansoftech.com/images/posts/2008-05-17_TaglocityConfig.png"><img height="410" src="http://www.fansoftech.com/images/posts/2008-05-17_TaglocityConfig.png" width="500" /></a> </p>
<p>Overall, I think the product fills a void (and then some) that Microsoft should have filled a long time ago.&#160; A <strong>long </strong>time ago.&#160; Install this (in addition to that other useful Outlook tool, <a href="http://www.xobni.com">xobni</a>) and you&#8217;ll actually find yourself becoming&#8230;gasp&#8230;productive.</p>
<p>Despite my rambling, there are a few areas of Taglocity I didn&#8217;t even cover so head on over to <a title="Taglocity: " href="http://www.taglocity.com" email="email" sharing="sharing" and="and" productivity="productivity" for="for" the="the" enterprise??="enterprise??">their site</a> and check out the product&#8230;and then <a title="Taglocity: Create Your Free Account" href="https://groups.taglocity.com/Login/CreateAccount.aspx">sign up for an account</a>.&#160; This new release is a <strong>dramatic</strong> improvement over v1.1 and should actually have enough weight behind it to take it into the mainstream.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/05/17/taglocity-v2-brings-productivity-enhancements-and-social-networking-to-outlook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Launches Outlook Calendar Sync.  I&#8217;ll Still Be Using Plaxo.</title>
		<link>http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/03/07/google-launches-outlook-calendar-sync-ill-still-be-using-plaxo/</link>
		<comments>http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/03/07/google-launches-outlook-calendar-sync-ill-still-be-using-plaxo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[outlook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plaxo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/03/07/google-launches-outlook-calendar-sync-ill-still-be-using-plaxo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Google Launches Outlook Calendar Sync.  I'll Still Be Using Plaxo."]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 20px" src="http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2139/2316775519_4ab75d7512_o.png" align="right" /> This past Wednesday, Google <a title="Official Google Blog: " google calendar sync"" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/blogspot/MKuf/~3/246437495/google-calendar-sync.html">introduced a new tool for Microsoft Windows/Office</a> users: <a title="Google Calendar Sync: Getting Started" href="http://www.google.com/support/calendar/bin/answer.py?answer=89955">Google Calendar Sync</a>.&#160; The application allows you to synchronize your Microsoft Office Outlook calendar with your Google account calendar.&#160; </p>
<p>The people have been clamoring for an official synchronization tool from Google for some time now and it&#8217;s finally being delivered.</p>
<p>As you can see from the screenshot over on the right, you have three different options for synchronization: <strong>1)</strong> 2-way, sync both your Google Calendar and Microsoft Outlook events with each other&quot; <strong>2)</strong> 1-way, &quot;sync only your Google Calendar events with Microsoft Outlook calendar&quot; <strong>3)</strong> 1-way, &quot;sync only your Microsoft Outlook events with Google Calendar.&quot;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a great tool to have, there&#8217;s no question about that, but it&#8217;s not quite enough for some people.&#160; Personally, I still plan on using <a title="Plaxo" href="http://www.plaxo.com">Plaxo</a>&#8217;s free synchronization service which includes a toolbar for use inside Microsoft Outlook.&#160; In addition, the Plaxo service enables you to synchronize not only your calendar but your tasks and contacts as well &#8211; and do so with MULTIPLE other products and services including Google, Windows Live, Windows Mail, Outlook Express, AOL/AIM, and Mac OS X.&#160; You&#8217;re also not limited to using one account per service with Plaxo (i.e., Plaxo can synchronize your Outlook calendar to your personal AND business Google, etc. accounts.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.fansoftech.com/2008/03/07/google-launches-outlook-calendar-sync-ill-still-be-using-plaxo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
